Mrsa Spread Through Saliva

More patients are on dialysis for renal failure in the US than in the UK and the CDC reported in 2007 that MRSA infections were 100 times more common in such patients than in the general population. Mrsa Spread Through Saliva mcKenna said it was unclear where the bacteria that attack dialysis patients come from. People can carry MRSA on their skin or nostrils without getting sick. But when their skin is pierced by a health provider inserting an IV line the bacteria gain easy access to the blood. Or they may jump to other patients with compromised immune systems. McKenna said the US had been lagging behind European countries in terms of infection control.

But when their skin is pierced by a health provider inserting an IV line the bacteria gain easy access to the blood. Or they may jump to other patients with compromised immune systems. McKenna said the US had been lagging behind European countries in terms of Mrsa Spread Through Saliva infection control.

MRSA superbug much more common in U. S. than UK They show Americans are more than six times as likely as Britons to contract the superbug in the community although rates of hospital infections are about the same. That’s despite the fact that MRSA — or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus — was first discovered in the UK and didn’t make it across the Atlantic until several years later. It is estimated that in 2005 it caused severe infections in nearly 95000 Americans killing more than 18500 of them. According to the new government statistics published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases about 29 per 100000 people in the US contract a MRSA bloodstream infection every year compared to 11 Britons. And when looking only at infections presumed to be acquired outside of hospitals the difference was even bigger: 22 cases per 100000 in the US and 3.

More patients are on dialysis for renal failure in the US than in the UK and the CDC reported in 2007 that MRSA infections were 100 times more common in such patients than in the general population. McKenna said it was unclear where the bacteria that attack dialysis patients come from. People can carry MRSA on their skin or nostrils without getting sick. But when their skin is pierced by a health provider inserting an IV line the bacteria gain easy access to the blood. Or they may jump to other patients with compromised immune systems. McKenna said the US had been lagging behind European countries in terms of infection control.

That’s despite the fact that MRSA — or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus — was first discovered in the UK and didn’t make it across the Atlantic until several years later. It is estimated that in 2005 it caused severe infections in nearly 95000 Americans killing more than 18500 of them. According to the new government statistics published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases about 29 per 100000 people in the US contract a MRSA bloodstream infection every year compared to 11 Britons.

But when their skin is pierced by a health provider inserting an IV line the bacteria gain easy access to the blood. Or they may jump to other patients with compromised immune systems. McKenna said the US had been lagging behind European countries in terms of infection control.

MRSA superbug much more common in U. S. than UK They show Americans are more than six times as likely as Britons to contract the superbug in the community although rates of hospital infections are about the same. That’s despite the fact that MRSA — or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus — was first discovered in the UK and didn’t make it across the Atlantic until several years later. It is estimated that in 2005 it caused severe infections in nearly 95000 Americans killing more than 18500 of them.

The Netherlands for instance has long been screening people for MRSA before admitting them to hospitals. If they carry the bug they are quarantined so they won’t infect others. While some hospitals in the US have recently implemented such a system too they are few and far between said McKenna.

According to the new government statistics published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases about 29 per 100000 people in the US contract a MRSA bloodstream infection every year compared to 11 Britons. And when

looking only at infections presumed to be

Mrsa Spread Through Saliva

acquired outside of hospitals the difference was even bigger: 22 cases per 100000 in the US and 3.5 in the UK. The question is why the big difference? The study tapped into data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the UK Health Protection Agency and differences between the two surveillance systems could be involved. But other factors might be at play too CDC’s Lessa told Reuters Health by e-mail. For instance more than three-quarters of Americans with community-onset MRSA had been in recent contact with the healthcare system.

And when looking only at infections presumed to be acquired outside of hospitals the difference was even bigger: 22 cases per 100000 in the US and 3.5 in the UK. The question is why the big difference? The study tapped into data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the UK Health Protection Agency and differences between the two surveillance systems could be involved. But other factors might be at play too CDC’s Lessa told Reuters Health by e-mail.

MRSA superbug much more common in U. S. than UK They show Americans are more than six times as likely as Britons to contract the superbug in the community although rates of hospital infections are about the same. That’s despite the fact that MRSA — or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus — was first discovered in the UK and didn’t make it across the Atlantic until several years later.

But other factors might be at play too CDC’s Lessa told Reuters Health by e-mail. For instance more than three-quarters of Americans with community-onset MRSA had been in recent contact with the healthcare system. Infected Americans were twice as likely as Britons to have been on dialysis and they more commonly had diabetes or had had a central intravenous line inserted by a health provider. This hints differences in both medical care and patient type between the two countries are important the researchers say.

MRSA superbug much more common in U. S. than UK They show Americans are more than six times as likely as Britons to contract the superbug in the community although rates of hospital infections are about the same. That’s despite the fact that MRSA — or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus — was first discovered in the UK and didn’t make it across he Atlantic until several years later.

Infected Americans were twice as likely as Britons to have been on dialysis and they more commonly had diabetes or had had a central intravenous line inserted by a health provider. This hints differences in both medical care and patient type between the two countries are important the researchers say –

  • McKenna said it was unclear where the bacteria that attack dialysis patients come from
  • More patients are on dialysis for renal failure in the US than in the UK and the CDC reported in 2007 that MRSA infections were 100 times more common in such patients than in the general population
  • And when looking only at infections presumed to be acquired outside of hospitals the difference was even bigger: 22 cases per 100000 in the US and 3

. More patients are on dialysis for renal failure in the US than in the UK and the CDC reported in 2007 that MRSA infections were 100 times more common in such patients than in the general population. McKenna said it was unclear where the bacteria that attack dialysis patients come from. People can carry MRSA on their skin or nostrils without getting sick.

But when their skin is pierced by a health provider inserting an IV line the bacteria gain easy access to the blood. Or they may jump to other patients with compromised immune systems. McKenna said the US had been lagging behind European countries in terms of infection control.

MRSA superbug much more common in U. S. than UK They show Americans are more than six times as likely as Britons to contract the superbug in the community although rates of hospital infections are about the same. That’s despite the fact that MRSA — or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus — was first discovered in the UK and didn’t make it across the Atlantic until several years later.

And when looking only at infections presumed to be acquired outside of hospitals the difference was even bigger: 22 cases per 100000 in the US Mrsa Spread Through Saliva and 3.5 in the UK. The question is why the big difference? The study tapped into data

Mrsa Spread Through Saliva

from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the UK Health Protection Agency and differences between the two surveillance systems could be involved. But other factors might be at play too CDC’s Lessa told Reuters Health by e-mail. For instance more than three-quarters of Americans with community-onset MRSA had been in recent contact with the healthcare system. Infected Americans were twice as likely as Britons to have been on dialysis and they more commonly had diabetes or had had a central intravenous line inserted by a health provider. This hints differences in both medical care and patient type between the two countries are important the researchers say.

The Netherlands for instance has long been screening people for MRSA before admitting them to hospitals. If they carry the bug they are quarantined so they won’t infect others. While some hospitals in the US have recently implemented such a system too they are few and far between said McKenna.

For instance more than three-quarters of Americans with community-onset MRSA had been in recent contact with the healthcare system. Infected Americans were twice as likely as Britons to have been on dialysis and they more commonly had diabetes or had had a central intravenous line inserted by a health provider. This hints differences in both medical care and patient type between the two countries are important the researchers say.

And when looking only at infections presumed to be acquired outside of hospitals the difference was even bigger: 22 cases per 100000 in the US and 3.5 in the UK. The question

is why the big difference? The study tapped into data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the UK Health Protection Agency and differences between the two surveillance systems could be involved. But other factors might be at play too CDC’s Lessa told Reuters Health by e-mail. For instance more than three-quarters of Americans with community-onset MRSA had been in recent contact with the healthcare system. Infected Americans were twice as likely as Britons to have been on dialysis and they more commonly had diabetes or had had a central intravenous line inserted by a health provider. This hints differences in both medical care and patient type between the two countries are important the researchers say.

Tags: , , <BR/>
Mrsa Spread Through Saliva 9 out of 10 based on 91 ratings.
 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.